Legal Opinion
Rubalcava v. Martinez
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 2007No. B199993PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
Respondents sought mandamus and injunctive relief against appellant City Council of Los Angeles (City Council) and other parties, contending that the City Council improperly approved an ordinance essentially similar to one that the City Council had repealed following respondents’ successful campaign to institute a referendum on it. The trial court granted respondents’ petition. We reverse.
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 22, 2006, the City Council adopted ordinance No. 178082, entitled “Hotel Worker Living Wage Ordinance” (Wage Ordinance). The ordinance set…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Aguiar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Building Industry Ass'n of the Bay Area v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Woodland Park Management, LLC v. City of East Palo Alto Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.