Legal Opinion
Aguiar v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 2009No. B208614PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
In 1997 the City of Los Angeles adopted a living wage ordinance (LWO) prescribing a minimum level of compensation for employees of private firms who work on service contracts benefiting the city. (L.A. Admin. Code, § 10.37 et seq.) The ordinance provides an employee is eligible for LWO wages and benefits if he or she “expends any of his or her time” on a city service contract. (L.A. Admin. Code, § 10.37.1, subd. (f).) Former regulation No. 5 (Regulation 5), promulgated by the city agency entrusted with implementing the LWO, provided, prior to its rescission in 2006, if an…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Borikas v. Alameda Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- LAZARIN v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Association of California Insurance Companies v. PoiznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- City of San Diego v. HaasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.