Legal Opinion
Austin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 10, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00352PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiffs, Breach of Contract; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, 7 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq.
OPINION
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiffs, Phyllis Austin and Penelope Burris, filed a transfer complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging breach of contract by the United States. Plaintiffs previously filed a complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development in the Circuit Court of Ripley County, Missouri. At…
2Cases cited132 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- E & E Enterprises Global, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.