State v. Burnam
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered September 16, 1911, upon a trial and conviction of a violation of the pure milk law.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The defendant was convicted of the offense of having in his possession, with intent to sell and deliver, milk *200of a grade below the standard fixed by law (Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2513), and has appealed.
The facts are that the appellant, at the time of the commission of the offense, was the secretary-treasurer and manager of Northwestern Dairy Company, a corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Oregon, and doing business in this state; that he was the manager of the active business of the corporation, employed and discharged the men, and bought and had general supervision of the mixing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. Detroit White Lead Works Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- State v. ConstatineWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. ClarkCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1891
- State v. NicollsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. LindbergWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. Liberty Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- People v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.