Legal Opinion

Carolene Products Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1944No. 5169PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia convicted the Carolene Products Company, its president, Charles Hauser, and its Vice-President, William H. Hartke, of a violation of the Filled Milk Act of 1923, 42 Stat. 1486, 21 U.S.C.A. § 61 et seq. The facts are undisputed and we accordingly adopt the following statement made by the court below, 51 F.Supp. 675, 676:

“The Carolene Products Company is a Michigan corporation, whose sole business is the sale of three products, , known respectively as ‘Milnot,’ ‘Milnut,’ and ‘Carolene.’ Milnut was,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Thomas E. Iverson, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. LawnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  5. Bourgeois v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API