Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Court Of Oyer And Terminer New York

Decided May 15, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Indictment against Charles P. Clark and others for violating the “Car-Heating Act.” Defendants moved to strike out counts 5 and 7 of the indictment, which motion being granted, they then demurred to each remaining count.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The defendants herein having been indicted for a misdemeanor, under chapter 616 of the Laws of 1887, as amended by chapter 189 of the Laws of 1888, and chapter 76 of the Laws of 1889, by an indictment consisting of-seven counts, this motion is made to set aside the fifth and' seventh counts of said indictment. The other counts accused the defendants *643of a misdemeanor, and alleged that the New York, New Haven So Hartford Railroad Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Connecticut, and operating a steam railroad of more than 50 miles in length, 26 miles of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The People v. . PetreaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Cowley v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Hatch v. . Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Wakeman v. . DalleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Shannon v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
  4. State v. BurnamWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. Salisbury Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API