Legal Opinion

State v. Nicolls

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1910No. 8919PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered February 11, 1910, upon a trial and conviction of selling intoxicating liquor to an Indian.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of selling liquor to one Plaster, an Indian of mixed blood: The apt words of the statute under which the information was drawn are as follows: “That any person who shall sell, give away, dispose of, exchange, or barter any malt, spirituous, or vinous liquor of any kind whatever ... to any Indian whatsoever, or a mixed-blood Indian being more than one-eighth Indian, shall be guilty,” etc. The fact of the selling is not denied. But the case is brought here upon numerous assignments of error, all of which are directed to two propositions of law; first,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GebhardMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. MamlockWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Keith v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. United States v. WardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1890
  5. United States v. HurshmanDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. LindbergWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. BurnamWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. KenneyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API