Stopthemillenniumhollywood.Com. v. City of L.A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, J.*
*4INTRODUCTION
In this appeal, Millennium Hollywood LLC (Millennium), the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles City Council (City) (collectively appellants) challenge the trial court's ruling that the proposed development of a four-and-a-half-acre parcel straddling Vine Street in Hollywood, California (the project) failed to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ( Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq. )
Specifically, appellants challenge four aspects of that decision. First, they argue that the trial court's finding that the project description…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Badin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Buena Vista Wat. Storage Dist. v. Kern Wat. Bank AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Buena Vista Water Storage Dist. v. Kern Water Bank Auth.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. Regents of the U. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. ParkerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.