Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. City of Ocean Shores

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 2004No. 29735-3-IIPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, C.J.

The City of Ocean Shores required owners of vacant lots within the City limits (owners) to pay water and sewer “availability charges,” although their properties were not connected to the City’s water and sewer systems. The owners of these vacant lots sued the *597City, claiming the charges were unconstitutional property taxes and not permissible regulatory fees. The trial court granted the owners summary judgment.

The City appeals, claiming that the charges are permissible and authorized by statute; that the trial court erred by rejecting the City’s affirmative defenses of laches, waiver, and…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Protect the Peninsula's Future v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Granville Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. KuehnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Cary v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Kitsap County v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Kitsap County v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API