Legal Opinion

Cary v. Mason County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2006No. 32753-8-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

¶1 — James R. Cary appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his action for declaratory judgment, arguing that a Mason County ordinance, adopted as a “special assessment,” is actually an invalid and unconstitutional “property tax.” The lower court ruled that the “reasonable time” for challenging the ordinance by a declaratory judgment action was 30 days and that Cary’s action was therefore time barred because he waited six months to file. We disagree, holding that Cary’s action is analogous to actions to recover any tax levied or assessed under RCW 84.68.060. Such actions must be commenced by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Berge v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Schreiner Farms, Inc. v. American Tower, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Global Neighborhood v. Respect WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Tim Eyman v. Robert FergusonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API