Legal Opinion
Protect the Peninsula's Future v. City of Port Angeles
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 19, 2013No. 43252-8-IIPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.
¶1 Protect the Peninsula’s Future, Clallam County Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, and Eloise Kailin (collectively Kailin) filed a complaint for a search warrant under RCW 69.41.060, claiming that fluoride is a legend drug and that the city of Port Angeles and the city of Forks (collectively Cities) unlawfully added fluoride to their public drinking water systems. The trial court denied Kailin’s motion to amend the complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Kailin appeals, arguing that (1) the dismissal for failure to state a claim was…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Keodalah v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
- Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Landstar Inway, Inc. v. SamrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hernandez v. StenderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hard 2 Find Accessories, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.