Legal Opinion

James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 1991No. 89-680PublishedCited by 773 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Souter

The question presented is whether our ruling in Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias, 468 U. S. 263 (1984), should apply retroactively to claims arising on facts antedating that decision. We hold that application of the rule in that case requires its application retroactively in later cases.

I — H

Prior to its amendment in 1985, Georgia state law imposed an excise tax on imported alcohol and distilled spirits at a rate double that imposed on alcohol and distilled spirits manufactured from Georgia-grown products. See Ga. Code Ann. § 3-4-60 (1982). In 1984, a Hawaii statute that similarly distinguished…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by773 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Cleamtee Garner, Father and Next-Of-Kin of Edward Eugene Garner, a Deceased Minor v. Memphis Police Department City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

768 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API