Legal Opinion

Jandro v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1989No. 87-252PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The principal question presented in Luis Jandro’s appeal relates to the admissibility of statements of co-conspirators in a prosecution for conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine, particularly with respect to the impact upon Jandro’s right of confrontation. Other issues which are presented involve whether there was probable cause to arrest Jandro so that money taken from him in a search incidental to his arrest was properly admitted into evidence and whether the failure of the arresting officers to *514furnish the information required pursuant to § 7-1-111, W.S.1977 (since…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Keehn v. Town of TorringtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Phillips v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Porth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API