Legal Opinion

Porth v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1994No. 92-263PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant Kevin Porth was convicted by a jury for conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery pursuant to Wyo.Stat. §§ 6-2-401(c)(ii) and 6-l-303(a)(1988). He was sentenced to no less than seventeen years and no longer than twenty-five years at the state penitentiary. His appeal raises issues concerning co-conspirator testimony, warrant-less arrest and sufficiency of evidence.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issues on appeal:

I. Did the trial court err when it required a witness whom the trial court and prosecution knew would exercise his fifth amendment right to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Curl v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Guerra v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API