Legal Opinion

Phillips v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1992No. 90-112PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Everett Phillips challenges his convictions for conspiracy to commit kidnapping and conspiracy to commit sexual assault. His convictions for kidnapping and sexual assault which were the objective of the conspiracies were reversed due to a speedy trial violation. Phillips v. State, 774 P.2d 118 (Wyo.1989) (Phillips I). The issues Phillips presents in this appeal concern double jeopardy and speedy trial questions as well as issues pertaining to the conduct of the trial.

*1065We affirm.

Phillips brings the following issues: ISSUE 1

The Fifth Amendment’s protection against double…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Phillips v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Hall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API