Legal Opinion

Oldham Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

It is not specifically alleged in the complaint that the alleged agreement made by defendants’ intestate was or was not in writing and that the complaint does not sufficiently state a cause of action is not challenged by demurrer, the accepted method of raising this issue of law. C. S., 511. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is one ordinarily interposed by the litigant seeking affirmative relief. When so interposed it admits the facts alleged in defense and challenges the sufficiency of such facts to constitute a defense. Barnes v. Trust Co., 194 N. C., 371, 139 S. E., 689; Pridgen v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Dix-Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Alston v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Barnes v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Churchwell v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Wike v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API