Legal Opinion

Dix-Downing v. . White

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

Nonsuit under the Hinsdale Act, C. S., 567, is permissible only on demurrer to the evidence, and not on demurrer to the complaint or motion for judgment on the pleadings. Riley v. Stone, 169 N. C., 421, 86 S. E., 348.

The record shows no demurrer to the complaint. Seawell v. Cole, 194 N. C., 546, 140 S. E., 85.

Nor was it according to precedent, simply upon reading the pleadings, to dismiss the action on the defendant’s plea of estoppel. Batson v. Laundry, ante, 371.

Beversed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Seawell v. Chas. Cole & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. TROY LUMBER COMPANY v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Sykes Ex Rel. Sykes v. BlakeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API