Legal Opinion

Clewett v. Clewett

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1955No. Civ. 21256PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tern.*

Defendant husband appeals from an interlocutory judgment of divorce which was granted upon the ground of extreme cruelty. Under a claim of insufficiency of the evidence appellant’s counsel argues the weight of the same, endeavoring to induce this court to reweigh it. “Upon an appeal every intendment is to be indulged in which tends to support the judgment (Hinds v. Oriental Products Co., Inc., 195 Cal. 655, 661 [235 P. 438]) and every reasonable inference which tends to support a finding must be accepted. (Estate of Bristol, 23 Cal.2d 221, 223 [143 P.2d 689].) The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Fleming v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Bratovich v. BratovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. In Re Marriage of RabieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Watson v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Fong Hong May v. Fong WanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API