Legal Opinion
Bratovich v. Bratovich
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1960No. Civ. 18765PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from an inter locutory decree of divorce granted to respondent. Appellant commenced the action seeking a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. Respondent cross-complained asking for a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty and for a determination of property rights. Appellant also attempts to appeal from an order denying her motion for a new trial. No appeal lies from that order and it is, therefore, dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Singleton v. Perry, 45 Cal.2d 489 [289 P.2d 794] ; Hamasaki v. Flotho, 39 Cal.2d 602 [248 P.2d 910].)
No question…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- McGann v. McGannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Dowd v. DowdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Florence Metcalfe, Administratrix of the Estate of John E. Metcalfe, Deceased v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Walter F. Lisek v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- A & S Air Conditioning v. John J. Moore Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Aeration Processes, Inc. v. JacobsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Oyler v. OylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.