Legal Opinion
Confar v. Whelan
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1935No. Civ. 1194PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem
This is an action against the district attorney o.f San Diego County and others for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs by reason of the unlawful arrest and detention of the minor child of plaintiffs. The American Bonding Company, a corporation, is joined as a defendant upon allegations that it is surety upon an official bond given by the district attorney for the faithful performance of his duties as such officer.
The demurrer of said bonding company to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend on December 3, 1934. A motion hj^ said company to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Brennan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Fogo v. Cutter Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Reeves v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Hotel Park Central, Inc. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lynch v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.