Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Miller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1990No. Case C-870623PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal, the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, the assignments of error, the briefs and arguments of counsel.

The plaintiff-appellant, Karl Stanton, has taken the instant appeal from the order of the trial court granting the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants-appellees J&J Distributing Company ("J&J Distributing") and Coleco Industries, Inc. ("Coleco"). For the reasons which follow, the judgment of the trial court is reversed in part, and this cause is remanded for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wever v. HicksOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ronald Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Kelsey v. Muskin Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westray v. Imperial Pools & Supplies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Borchers v. Winzeler Excavating Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ferguson v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Davis v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API