Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational Industries

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1992No. Docket Nos. 85391, 88429, 88580, (Calendar Nos. 1-3)Published

1DissentLevin, J.

The question presented is whether summary disposition was properly granted defendant manufacturers and sellers of aboveground swimming pools on the basis that the danger of diving in a shallow aboveground swimming pool is open and obvious.

We would hold that the plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact whether the danger is open and obvious, and would remand these cases for trial.

The plaintiff in each of these cases became quadriplegic as the result of diving in an above-ground swimming pool, and commenced an action claiming that the manufacturer and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. East Penn Manufacturing Co. v. PinedaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API