Wever v. Hicks
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeebeet, J.
In a personal-injury action arising out of an automobile accident, when may the defendant-driver properly assert the defense of assumption of risk against the plaintiff-passenger who asserts wilful and wanton misconduct on the part of the defendant-driver?
Plaintiff argues (1) that the defense of assumption of the risk is not conceptually different from the defense of contributory negligence, (2) that contributory negligence is not a defense where wilful and wanton misconduct on the part of the defendant is proved, and (3) that, therefore, assumption of the risk should likewise not be a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Francis v. BieberOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Porter v. Toledo Terminal Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Gill, Jr., a Minor v. ArthurOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by36 opinions
- O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Grau v. KleinschmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.