Legal Opinion

Wever v. Hicks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1967No. 40342PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeebeet, J.

In a personal-injury action arising out of an automobile accident, when may the defendant-driver properly assert the defense of assumption of risk against the plaintiff-passenger who asserts wilful and wanton misconduct on the part of the defendant-driver?

Plaintiff argues (1) that the defense of assumption of the risk is not conceptually different from the defense of contributory negligence, (2) that contributory negligence is not a defense where wilful and wanton misconduct on the part of the defendant is proved, and (3) that, therefore, assumption of the risk should likewise not be a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Francis v. BieberOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Porter v. Toledo Terminal Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Gill, Jr., a Minor v. ArthurOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Grau v. KleinschmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API