Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rose v. James

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1991No. 89-2038PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Mandamus lies to require a public agency or its officer to reinstate an employee to his former position if the employee is wrongfully excluded from it. State, ex rel. Osborn, v. Jackson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41, 53, 75 O.O. 2d 132, 138, 346 N.E. 2d 141, 148. According to State, ex rel. Crance, v. Kennedy (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 166, 7 O.O. 3d 316, 373 N.E. 2d 383, a member of the metropolitan housing authority holds a public office because the authority exercises powers and duties conferred on officers of municipal corporations, is exempt from taxation, may issue bonds for corporate purposes,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Crance v. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education of North Olmsted City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Fenton v. Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API