Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Talikka

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 94-1021PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Sheriff Johnson asserts in his first proposition of law that quo warranto is the only remedy available in law or equity to challenge the appointment of either a special prosecutor or an assistant prosecutor. The court of appeals denied quo warranto relief on the basis that Sheriff Johnson “has a remedy at law by way of a motion to dismiss, which if overruled by the trial court, may be appealed at the conclusion of the proceedings against him.” Extraordinary writs like quo warranto provide extraordinary, not alternative remedies, and they will not lie where there exists an adequate remedy in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Luna v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Cartmell v. DorrianOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. McArthur v. DeSouzaOhio Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Zeigler v. ZumbarOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Deiter v. McGuireOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Master v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API