Legal Opinion

Waddell v. Woods

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1944No. 36,016PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff growing out of X-ray treatments administered by defendant.

Defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, on the ground it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was overruled and defendant appeals. It is clear from the briefs submitted that in the trial court the plaintiff contended, as he does here, that he had stated facts sufficient to warrant application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, and that defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Starks Food Markets, Inc. v. El Dorado Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Casenburg v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. GaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API