Legal Opinion

James v. Grigsby

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1923No. 24,637PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*628The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for damages for malpractice. It was tried to a jury which made findings of fact and returned a general verdict for plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

Appellant’s main contention is that the court should have sustained his demurrer to the evidence which makes it necessary for us to examine the evidence offered by plaintiff in chief.

The plaintiff, a man fifty-eight years old, was living on a farm with his mother, eighty-one years of age. On May 31,1920, he met with an accident in which the femur of his left leg was broken…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Pettigrew v. Lewis & WillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Berkholz v. BenepeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Shea v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API