Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1926No. 26,829PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. It is predicated upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed, and contends the court erred in overruling its demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, in refusing to submit special questions, and to give instructions requested, and in the instructions given. The questions here to be determined depend upon the proper understanding of the doctrine expressed by the maxim res ipsa loquitur and its application to the case before us.

Brief…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. Price v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Starks Food Markets, Inc. v. El Dorado Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Bradley v. Conway Springs Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API