Legal Opinion

Eaves v. City of Ottumwa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 5, 1949No. 47264PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

— Plaintiffs’ petition in twenty-eight counts seeks damages resulting from a flood on May 23, 1944, to twenty-eight properties in defendant-city. At least most of the damaged properties are residences and contents thereof in an area adjacent to a diversion channel or race used by the city in the operation of its hydroelectric plant. Each count in turn consists of two divisions. The first division charges specific negligence of the city and the second is based on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Count 23 for damage to the Yeoman property was first tried under an arrangement whereby a verdict…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Cassady v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. DunneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Oak Leaf Country Club, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Wiles v. MyerlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Shinofield v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Ruud v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Thompson v. Burke Engineering Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API