Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
This is an appeal from an order overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. In the case below, W. H. Hammond, doing business as Hammond Ice' Cream Company, was made á party defendant. He died prior to the trial court’s ruling and revivor proceedings have not been had. Defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company is sole appellant.
The allegations of the petition may be summarized and quoted, as follows: That the Hartford Accident.& Indemnity Company is a foreign corporation and has made application to and received permission…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Benkendorfer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Little v. ButnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Worden v. Union Gas System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.