Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 20, 1956No. 40,155PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This is an appeal from an order overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. In the case below, W. H. Hammond, doing business as Hammond Ice' Cream Company, was made á party defendant. He died prior to the trial court’s ruling and revivor proceedings have not been had. Defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company is sole appellant.

The allegations of the petition may be summarized and quoted, as follows: That the Hartford Accident.& Indemnity Company is a foreign corporation and has made application to and received permission…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Mayes v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Benkendorfer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Little v. ButnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Worden v. Union Gas System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API