Marusa v. Erie Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} Based on the insurance policy that Maria Marusa has with Erie Insurance Company, we conclude that summary judgment against her and her daughter was improperly granted and that their claim for uninsured-motorist coverage is not precluded.
I. Background
{¶ 2} In November 2009, appellant Maria Marusa was driving her car when it was struck by a police cruiser driven by Officer Michael Canda. Marusa and her daughter Melanie, also an appellant, were both injured in the accident. The parties stipulated that the Marusas’ injuries were proximately caused by Officer Canda’s negligent operation of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- M.H. v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Cintas Corp. No. 2 v. Becker Property Services LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ironics, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Midland Funding, L.L.C. v. HottenrothOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Burr v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Capital One Bank v. McCladdieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.