Legal Opinion

Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1987No. 86-1359PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The first issue presented for our determination is whether the express terms of the excess major medical insurance policy permit a modification of the allowable benefits payable; or whether plaintiffs’ rights to unlimited nursing care benefits vested, thus entitling them to such benefits under the original terms of the excess policy.

Defendants-appellees argue that the operative provision relied on by the court of appeals below (i.e., the “Benefit Provision”) guarantees benefits solely for expenses incurred within a benefit period. It is the defendants’ contention that the policy in issue is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ohio Farmers Ins. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lane v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API