Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The first issue presented for our determination is whether the express terms of the excess major medical insurance policy permit a modification of the allowable benefits payable; or whether plaintiffs’ rights to unlimited nursing care benefits vested, thus entitling them to such benefits under the original terms of the excess policy.
Defendants-appellees argue that the operative provision relied on by the court of appeals below (i.e., the “Benefit Provision”) guarantees benefits solely for expenses incurred within a benefit period. It is the defendants’ contention that the policy in issue is a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ohio Farmers Ins. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by86 opinions
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Lane v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.