Legal Opinion

Curry v. Tucker

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1980No. 4249PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER *, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BURKE, Justice.

In this action for breach of contract, the primary question to be determined is whether the vendee’s conduct in breaching two real estate contracts justified the trial court’s application of the extreme remedy of forfeiture. We conclude that under the circumstances of this case the declaration of forfeiture was appropriate.

In late 1967, David Curry was in severe financial trouble. He had recently been forced to close his business and had lost his homestead through foreclosure. He sought…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Adoption of v. M. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hausam v. WodrichAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. SpearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hendrickson v. FreericksAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stanhope v. StanhopeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Gudenau v. BierriaAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API