Legal Opinion

Hausam v. Wodrich

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1978No. 3064PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEYER, C. J., and RABI-NO WITZ, CONNOR, and BURKE, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court granting specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. Finding no error, we affirm.

Appellant Neal Hausam is the legal owner of a piece of land in the Roosevelt Park subdivision in Anchorage which is improved with a fourplex apartment building. Ap-pellees Louis and Janet Wodrich learned from their real estate broker, Hollis Gamel, that the property was for sale, and on March 24, 1975, the Wodriches signed a purchase agreement,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Adoption of v. M. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Heritage v. Pioneer Brokerage & Sales, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Troyer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API