Legal Opinion

Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. Spears

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1982No. 5273, 5301PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from a summary judgment entered by the superior court in favor of Dillingham Commercial Company. The summary judgment decreed specific performance of a purchase option given to Dillingham in a lease between Dillingham and Virginia Spears. In addition, the superior court ordered that Dillingham pay Spears $20,016.50 in interest on the purchase price, and $6,000 for fire insurance premiums (including interest) paid by Spears. The court awarded Dillingham attorney’s fees of $6,710 and costs in the amount of $1,737.52 as prevailing party on the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Norton v. HerronAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Waterkist Corporation, Debtor. City of Valdez, Alaska v. Waterkist CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Freidus v. EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API