Moran v. Holman
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
This appeal arises from Holman’s successful suit against Moran for a decree of specific performance on a land sale contract. Almost all of Moran’s specifications of error go to one assertion, that given the facts of the instant case the trial court erred in refusing to enforce the strict foreclosure clause of the contract. 1
The superior court found that the parties had entered into a written contract on September 9, 1967, for the purchase and sale of certain real property in Fairbanks. 2 Moran was the vendor and Holman was the vendee. The purchase price was $6,350,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Harold L. Ward v. Union Bond & Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Jameson v. WurtzAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Williams v. DeLayAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Wetzler v. WetzlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Bachner v. RichAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.