Stimac v. Wissman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The defendants, Hubert Wissman and Clara Wissman, husband and wife, owned real property located on highway US-31 near the city of South Haven, Michigan. Upon this property they constructed a building equipped with plumbing facilities and toilet rooms for use as a drive-in restaurant. To serve its intended purpose it was necessary that the project have water. None was municipally furnished to the property. The defendants accordingly ran a pipe into the building from an adjacent property upon which there was a producing well in operation. The adjacent property was owned by defendant Clara…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rich v. Daily Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Clare County Savings Bank v. FeatherlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Sharrar v. Wayne Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Grinnell Bros. v. AsiuliewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Rex Oil & Gas Company v. BuskMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.