Legal Opinion

Stimac v. Wissman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. Docket 18, Calendar 45,960PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The defendants, Hubert Wissman and Clara Wissman, husband and wife, owned real property located on highway US-31 near the city of South Haven, Michigan. Upon this property they constructed a building equipped with plumbing facilities and toilet rooms for use as a drive-in restaurant. To serve its intended purpose it was necessary that the project have water. None was municipally furnished to the property. The defendants accordingly ran a pipe into the building from an adjacent property upon which there was a producing well in operation. The adjacent property was owned by defendant Clara…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rich v. Daily Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Clare County Savings Bank v. FeatherlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Sharrar v. Wayne Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Grinnell Bros. v. AsiuliewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rex Oil & Gas Company v. BuskMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API