Legal Opinion

Clare County Savings Bank v. Featherly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by the Clare County Savings Bank against Gerald Featherly, Blanche Featherly, and Frank Coleman upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff as to two defendants, but in favor of defendant Coleman. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants to recover the balance due upon a promissory note bearing date December 20, 1909, wherein the defendants promised to pay to the plaintiff, or order, six months after date, the sum of $700, with interest at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. The note was signed by the three defendants. There had been indorsed as paid upon the note the sum of $469.40 on May 17, 1911. Default after personal service was regularly entered as to the defendants Gerald L. Featherly and Blanche Featherly. The defendant Frank Coleman pleaded the general issue and gave notice that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Blackwood v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Mt. Vernon Stone Co. v. J.R. Sheely & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Hand v. Ryan Drug Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stimac v. WissmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. New Prague Flouring Mill Co. v. Hewett Grain & Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Central Jersey Dodge Truck Center, Inc. v. Sightseer Corporation and Prf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. Hogue v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Sharrar v. Wayne Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API