Rich v. Daily Creamery Co.

This is the second time this case has been before this court on appeal by defendants from verdicts rendered by juries and judgments entered thereon in favor of plaintiff, the former appeal being reported in 296 Mich. 270 (134 A. L. R. 232).

A recital of the factual issues involved would be a mere repetition of what we said in the first appeal, when we determined that plaintiff, under the plead ings and proofs, had clearly established a cause of action against defendants, warranting a recovery of damages for the tortious acts of said defendants, but that the trial court had erred in his charge…