Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS
This case is a wrongful discharge/religious discrimination action brought against the defendant, Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, by Jane Scholz, a- former employee of defendant at its North Kent Mall Store in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The Court held in abeyance defendant’s application for leave to appeal pending decisions in Bullock v Automobile Club of Michigan, 432 Mich 472; 444 NW2d 114 (1989), and In re Certified Question, Bankey v Storer Broadcasting Co, 432 Mich 438; 443 NW2d 112 (1989). On May 2, 1990, we granted leave to appeal. 1
The sole issue to be decided…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Swanson v. Liquid Air CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Nieves v. Bell Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.