Legal Opinion

Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1991No. 80709, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS

This case is a wrongful discharge/religious discrimination action brought against the defendant, Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, by Jane Scholz, a- former employee of defendant at its North Kent Mall Store in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

The Court held in abeyance defendant’s application for leave to appeal pending decisions in Bullock v Automobile Club of Michigan, 432 Mich 472; 444 NW2d 114 (1989), and In re Certified Question, Bankey v Storer Broadcasting Co, 432 Mich 438; 443 NW2d 112 (1989). On May 2, 1990, we granted leave to appeal. 1

The sole issue to be decided…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Swanson v. Liquid Air CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. Nieves v. Bell Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API