Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Time, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 13, 1994No. Civ-S-93-1165 DFL GGH through Civ-S-93-1167 DFL GGH and Civ-S-93-1313 DFL GGHPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to enjoin various of the statements made by defendants in their widely distributed magazine sweepstakes solicitations. Plaintiff Eben Haskell brings suit on behalf of himself and the general public of California against defendants Time Warner, Inc. (“Time Warner”), Time, Inc. (“Time”), Publishers Clearing House (“PCH”), The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (“RDA”), and American Family Publishers (“American”). 1 All defendants except Time Warner solicit magazine subscriptions through the mail. 2 To enlist subscribers,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.