Legal Opinion

Hutson v. Continental Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 1, 1977No. 20504PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

This appeal encompasses five separate suits brought by-respondent Jerry Hutson against the appellants, Continental Assurance Company (Continental) and Harco Insurance Services, Inc. (Harco), seeking damages for breach of several contracts of credit disability insurance allegedly issued by and through the appellants ■ to Hutson. The five actions have identical captions, present the same issues, and encompass essentially the same cause of action with each cause relating to a particular installment contract executed by Hutson.

The pertinent facts are that at some time before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Superior Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. Hiers v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Hobbs v. Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Ford v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Brown v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Robertsen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  5. SHIFTLET v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API