Legal Opinion

Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 21, 1984No. 0237PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The broad issue raised on this appeal is whether on the evidence presented, respondent Todd, an employee-at-will of the appellants South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Mutual), Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (Casualty) and Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company (Life), is entitled to damages for termination of his employment on the theories of outrage, intentional interference with a contract, and bad-faith termination of a contract. The trial court, in denying the appellants’ motions for summary judgment, nonsuit, directed verdict and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. MBM Co., Inc. v. CounceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Graham Flowers Frankie Dukes v. Tandy Corporation, and William Lee Flowers Martha Floyd GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Frankie L. Barber v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Wilkes v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. White v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API