Legal Opinion
O'Neal v. Bowles
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 17, 1993No. 23800PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Justice:
We hereby withdraw the opinion in O’Neal v. Bowles, Op. No. 23800, (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed February 16,1993) (Davis Adv. Sh. No. 4 at 10), and substitute the following opinion.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial nisi additur. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Daniel L. O’Neal (O’Neal) fractured his leg in a motorcycle accident in March 1987. Respondent Dr. Robert H. Bowles (Dr. Bowles) operated on O’Neal’s leg to repair the injury. During the operation, the peroneal nerve was severed by Dr.- Bowles. In June 1987, Dr. Bowles operated a second time to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Zorn Ex Rel. Estate of Zorn v. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Easler v. HEJAZ TEMPLE OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Jones v. Ingles Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Bocook Outdoor Media, Inc. v. Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.