Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 9, 1940No. 15124PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

Plaintiff brought this action for the recovery of damages alleged to have been suffered by him as a direct and proximate result of drinking a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured by the defendant, which contained some “vile and/or poisonous, and/or polluted, foul, contaminated, and/or revolting substance or substances therein, which resembled and/or appeared to be decayed cockroaches, and/or other bugs, and/or varmints and/or foul and unwholesome substances or materials, animal, vegetable, and/or mineral.”

At the trial of the case the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gumb v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Gantt v. Columbia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Jeffords v. Florence CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Sonneborn v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Lipscomb v. TannerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arthur W. Niedland and Margaret W. Niedland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Superior Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Hutson v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. SHIFTLET v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  5. Sheek v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API