Legal Opinion

Mader v. Christie

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1921No. Civ. No. 3386PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside his default and the judgment entered" thereon.

In the month of June, 1911, the plaintiff, through the alleged negligence of the defendant, suffered an injury necessitating the amputation of his left leg. About one year later he commenced an action against the defendant to recover damages therefor. At the trial of that action it appeared that plaintiff two days after the injury entered into a contract with the defendant whereby he released the defendant from all liability on account of said injury in consideration of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People ex rel. Schwartz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Brooks v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. B & B Sulphur Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Goatman v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hunt, Mirk & Company v. Hesperides Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API