Legal Opinion

Goatman v. Fuller

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1923No. L. A. No. 7090PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This action was originally brought by the plaintiffs to have themselves declared to be the owners of a certain lease of real property; to compel the defendants to transfer the lease to them and to account to them for all the rents, issues, and profits of the leased premises. Pursuant to findings of fact and conclusions of law made and filed by the court, an interlocutory decree was entered in favor of the plaintiffs on July 7, 1919, which decree was subsequently affirmed on appeal. (50 Cal. App. 403 [195 Pac. 256].) No question of the merits of the case is involved in this proceeding.

In their…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Halpern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Benway v. BenwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Haynes v. Los Angeles Railroad Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API