Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Huggins v. Bridges

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1917No. 14296PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered July 9, 1917, in favor of the plaintiffs, upon overruling demurrers to the complaints, in an action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— On November 3, 1915, the Seattle Port Commission adopted a resolution which provided for the construction and operation of a belt line railway to be known as Unit No. 14, which was submitted to the voters of the Seattle port district and ratified by them on December 4, 1915. At the same time that the above mentioned resolution was submitted, a further resolution providing for bond issues with which to secure money to build Unit No. 14, which had also been passed by the commissioners of the port district, was submitted to the voters of the district, and at the same election at which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tacoma Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Port of Seattle v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Utah Rapid Transit Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Woodward v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API