Legal Opinion

Barr v. Cowlitz County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1923No. 18122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Barr, as adminis-tratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, seeks recovery of damages from Cowlitz county and the city of Kelso for his death, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the county and city in the maintenance of a defective bridge over the Cowlitz river, within that county and city, which bridge collapsed while her husband was driving over it in an automobile, thereby causing his death. The county demurred to Mrs. Barr’s amended complaint, upon the ground that no cause of action' was stated therein as against the county, and especially upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rands v. Clarke CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wendel v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Taake v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Davis v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Collensworth v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woodward v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City of Pineville v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Vizzaro v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Grant v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Thompson v. United States Bakery IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API