Legal Opinion
Tulsa Creamery Co. v. Tulsa Milk Products Co-Operative Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 1935No. 21921PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WBLCI-I, J.,
The purpose of this action, commenced in the trial court January 4, 1030, was to obtain an injunction restraining the defendant, Tulsa Creamery Company, from purchasing its milk supply from any other person than the plaintiff, Tulsa Milk Products Co-Operative Association, Inc.
For some time prior to December 30, 1929, the plaintiff had furnished and sold milk to the defendant pursuant to a written contract. One of the purposes of the contract was to bind defendant to purchase all its milk supply from plaintiff, and it contained such a provision. However, during the above period the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Malinoski v. D. S. McGrath, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Bradshaw v. . MillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- McCarthy v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williamson v. NeedlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Crushed Stone Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006